Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Speaking of health care….

We have to talk about this.  Caution: some may be offended by the following.  So, before you go forward, be aware that the content is strong.  Some may not like it.  If you’re open minded, want some facts and new ideas, tune in. 

Health care costs are spiraling out of control.  We know there are problems with our current system.  We’re told if they are left untended, the current system will bankrupt us.  

We hear there are 40 million uninsured people in the U.S.  By the time you back out those who are illegal and those who will not buy insurance, you’re left with 10-12 million.   

Those in the Congressional majority have introduced a variety of proposals to remedy this situation.  Few, if any, of our elected officials have actually read what the staffers who draft legislation have put in these bills.  That became painfully obvious during last months town hall meetings. 

While the legislation is torturously grinding its way through Congress, the American people are waking up to other startling news.

We are starting to hear these frightening numbers over the next 10 years….

$13 trillion added to the national debt, publicly held debt passing $10 trillion, spending exceeding 28% of gross domestic product and per household federal spending topping $37,000 (compared to $25,000 now). 

Let’s summarize.  We now have trillions of debt.  Social Security is going broke at a more rapid rate than thought.  Medicare is on a collision course with financial catastrophe…and that’s before it starts absorbing the cost of Baby Boomer participation.

And now, in the middle of the worst recession in a generation, the President wants to nationalize – some say socialize – our medical system…17% of our national economy.    

Let’s stop a minute and take a quick glance in the rear view mirror: 

It’s telling us what many respected economists and financial prognosticators predicted:  the so-called stimulus package has had very little impact on what looks like may be a bottoming out of our economy.

It looks like the taxpayers will get very little return on their investment.

Many experts tell us those debt and deficit numbers I mentioned earlier are under-estimated, arrived at only by assumptions that have little bearing to reality.

Incredibly, these numbers do not include $43 trillion in unfunded Medicare and Social Security obligations, almost guaranteeing insolvency absent radical reform.

Now we have this debate about a nationalized take-over of our entire health care system, which by all accounts will leave behind the residue of debt and deficits described above.

Few seem to have any faith in the Washington elite to run our country with any sensibility or common sense any more.  They know Medicare benefits will be cut.  They know none of this can be financed (much) without higher taxes, inflation or both.  In today’s economy that makes America less competitive and less secure.  And those toting the note – remember nearly 50% of Americans pay zero income tax! – are angry and letting their voices be heard.

Frank Lutz has documented this anger in his new book, What People Really Want…Really.  People do not feel their elected officials are accountable.  They feel no one is listening.

This frustration was evident at recent town hall meetings.  It revealed itself again last week in the governor’s races in NJ and VA.  A significant number of local races confirmed it.

At town hall meetings throughout the US many constituents knew more about the legislative proposals than the elected officials standing in front of their constituents.  Others are angry because some politicians are hiding, refusing to hold town hall meetings. 

Congressional leaders are saying all of this “orchestrated”; they refer to those attending the meetings as “Nazis” and “Astro-Turf,” as if the protests are not legitimate.  Now that’s how to get the folks riled up. 

To throw a little fuel on the fire, three weeks ago it was reported that a government agency notified Humana, in effect, to stop sending their customers letters that could be construed as misleading information about the proposals floating around Capitol Hill.  Forget about the fact that within 24 hours the Congressional Budget Office verified the accuracy of the letter.

Former president Carter – even Bill Cosby – is telling us that most who oppose a government take-over of health care are racist.  Not to be outdone, Mr. Clinton weighed in by resurrecting his family’s belief that all who oppose Mr. Obama are part of a “vast, right-wing conspiracy.”

Just a few months ago those in control of Congress held up the Congressional Budget Office as the paragon of honest assessments about the impact of proposed legislation.  Now, when those assessments aren’t working in their favor, the CBO is the devil incarnate.

Yes, tempers are flaring.  Each side says the other is misrepresenting “the facts.”  One congressman is formally rebuked by the majority for shouting “You lie” during the president’s joint session speech.  My father-in-law used to watch all the shenanigans in Washington, D.C. and say, “There’s a whole lot of prevaricating going on here.”  Pure wisdom, that.    

Now the House has passed a bill.  It’s DOA in the Senate.  The Senate Finance Committee tried to rush through a bill with little, if any, review.  They will go back to the drawing board and try again.  We should be frightened when they vote down a provision to post the bill on the internet for 72 hours for review and comment.  These bills are being written by committee staffers, no one knows the provisions or tells voters what the implications will be. 

As many of you know, I spent some time in D.C. a few years ago.  Those who know me well know I came back from that experience with a different attitude about what goes on in our nation’s capital.  Democracy with open market capitalism remains the best system.  Yet, our system is in desperate need of repair. 

What’s my reaction to the health care debate?  I will not rant then offer nothing for a suggestion.

It’s said we will pay for part of health care reform (and the other programs contributing to this crazy amount of debt) through the savings generated by eliminating waste and fraud in our health care system. 

My first reaction is those who offer that suggestion are either negligent or naive.  Negligent because all that waste and fraud didn’t just appear in the last few weeks; negligent because those controlling Congress – including Mr. Obama as a sitting U.S. Senator – failed to introduce legislation to address this “waste and fraud” problem during the last two years of the Bush administration when they controlled Congress.

Don’t get me wrong.  I agree there is plenty of waste and fraud that needs to be cleaned up.  How about this proposal? 

Someone in Congress introduce a bill containing the legislative proposals and regulatory enforcement provisions to clean up “waste and fraud” before we move forward with a complete takeover of our health care.  Frankly, Congress doesn’t have enough good will with me for me to take them at their word.   

I’m from Missouri so I would like to see proponents of a nationalized plan “show me” examples of other countries who have successfully pulled this off without causing severe strain on their national budgets or who have not had to initiate a value-added tax (essentially a national sales tax) to pay for the exploding costs.  Or had serious waiting lines as a result. 

I say naïve because Massachusetts and Tennessee have passed a form of universal and/or mandated health care coverage.  The program is busting the budgets in both states.  Yet they seem to shy away from citing those states as shining examples of how great a nationalized plan with similar components will work.

Let’s give Mr. Obama this…he campaigned on this platform…he won…we knew this was coming…he had to know it would stir up a hornet’s nest…yet he did it any way.  It’s been on the agenda of his party for 40-50 years.  So, it’s no surprise this is happening, despite the difficulties.  If the nationalized plan fails it is a serious setback to his presidency.  The stakes are huge, for him and for our country.  Give him an “A” for courage.

Whether this is good policy is another issue.

Unfortunately, this really isn’t about improving health care.  It’s about political control and creating a legacy of permanent political supporters.  It’s about the Europeanization of America.

My grandfather once said, paraphrasing someone else, I’m sure, “When a politician’s platform is to rob Peter to pay Paul, he can always count on Paul’s vote.”

And, there a whole lot of folks out there that vehemently oppose the European path.  If they are a taxpayer, they also question whether it’s good to let Paul cast a political vote.

Here’s what I would like to see done before we turn one-sixth of our economy over to the federal government.

As I said before, have Congress introduce and pass legislation to identify waste and fraud, isolate it and eliminate it.  Success here will go a long way to re-establishing the belief that government can actually function.    

Allow insurance companies to sell insurance across state lines.  There are already 1300 insurance companies out there.  Increase competition even more.  You can buy your automobile coverage across state lines, even your homeowners and life insurance.  Why not health insurance?  Most people don’t even know about this government regulation and it stymies competition and causes rates to be higher than needed.

Treat the tax deductibility of health insurance the same for companies and individuals.

Tort reform is essential to meaningful cost cutting. 

Allow purchasing co-ops to be formed.  Permit the co-op to accept individual or small business members and negotiate better policies with insurance companies. 

Make pricing transparency from hospitals mandatory.  Let people see what services cost before the procedure.

If a bill is passed and signed into law make it mandatory that Congress is covered by the same “government option” that the rest of us have to endure.   

Eliminate current “pre-existing conditions” policy and make every policy portable.  This means you cannot be denied coverage because of prior health issues.  And, once you have a policy, you have it as long as you pay the premium.

For families with income below the poverty level, make it mandatory they enroll in one of the co-ops.  Once they are enrolled, have the government send the co-op a check for $5,000.  If a person receiving government benefits of any kind cannot present proof of insurance upon demand, all their benefits are terminated.  This would be much cheaper than passing a law that creates over a 125 new government agencies and adds trillions to our national debt.

Allow an illegal who is paying taxes to come forward and enroll with a co-op.  They can stay covered as long as they stay enrolled AND enter a program that leads to becoming a citizen within two years.  If not, they will have committed a felony, subject to ten years incarceration.  Deportation won’t work if we have no fences or enforcement of current policies.  This will be good for all.

Now, I could go on and on but I’m exhausted. 

There are two distinct visions in America about which direction is best for our nation.  Ironically, the European path – fascist, socialistic policies – are being rejected in….yes, Europe.  The other choice is the one most visible in Asia, emerging democracies, exploding capitalism.  I come down on the side of the individual; on the side of capitalism; on the side of markets to reward and punish.  We need government as a vehicle to defend our shores, not much else.  In this latest recession it’s been easy to blame capitalism…those who make money.  Capitalism did not create this problem.  People created this problem.  To be more accurate, the greed of people created this problem.  The “market” didn’t create Bernie Madoff.  Bernie Madoff created Bernie Madoff.

We have an immigration problem largely due to the fact our government officials will not enforce laws currently on the books.  They don’t want to lose the votes.  In 2006-8 there are video tapes on U-tube showing Bush officials warning Congressional committees about the impending crisis in our financial system, specifically Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  They were ridiculed, called racist.  They ignored the problem.  Now they want us to support even more regulation which they, over time, will ignore.

It proves again one of my favorite thoughts – it’s behaviors that matter. 

It’s going to get rough.  We watching it manifest, up close.  It will get personal.

Fifty years ago Ayn Rand penned a now famous – then heavily criticized – book that described as one of its two major themes the notion that the creative human mind requires political-economic freedom in order to achieve, to make the great advances that benefit an entire society. 

This is a turning point in our nation’s history.  We have the opportunity, as Rand described, to see if we unleash our citizens to provide the explosive growth we need to absorb massive deficits and compete in a world economy or whether in the alternative, Atlas will shrug.

While attending a meeting of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, of which I am a Fellow and long-time member, one of the presenters discussed the status of legislative proposals concerning estate tax. In a nutshell….

Today the estate tax exclusion is $3.5 million. As written, current law says the estate tax will be repealed in 2010 and revert back to a $1 million exemption in 2011. With 58 seats in the Senate (plus two Independents), a clear majority of 255 in the House and their party occupying the White House, no one in their right mind thinks the Democrats are going to let this stand. They are on a desperate search for money…and it’s about to get worse. The estate tax will not be going away. However, the three major reform bills are stalled pending the passage of health care legislation. Once complete, expect them to turn their attention to a few tax bills, including these.

Before I outline these, you’ll have to pay careful attention to the irony, even hypocrisy, of the names attached to these bills.

First, we have the Certain Estate Tax Relief Act of 2009 (“CETRA”). It makes the $3.5 million exclusion permanent, reunifies the gift and estate tax and applies a 45% rate of all estates in excess of the exclusion.

Next comes the Taxpayer Certainty and Relief Act of 2009 (“TCRA”). Certainty and relief in a tax bill? Again, the exclusion remains at $3.5 million, this time indexed for inflation after 2011. That’s getting somewhere, because I’m guessing we might have a little inflation somewhere down the road. This bill also imposes a 45% rate on amounts in excess of the exclusion. It increases the Special Use valuation from $1 million to $3.5 million, introduces the concept of “marital deduction portability” and includes middle income tax cuts.

Then we have the Sensible Estate Tax Act of 2009 (“SETA”). Again, I’m shaking my head and laughing out loud at these names. This bill comes with a lower $2 million exclusion, also reunifies the gift and estate tax laws and taxes the excess over the exclusion at rates beginning at 45% and capping out at 55%, depending on the size of the estate.

In addition to these proposals there are others that will seriously impact wealth preservation strategies. There will be new restrictions on the use of short-term Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts and either elimination or severe restriction in the use of entity discounts. The latter change will alter our thinking on the use of family limited partnerships and limited liability companies in our planning.

I expect patchwork legislation at the end of 2009 that will extend the $3.5 million exclusion for a year or two until they can get back to it…only after ending a couple of wars, running the auto and banking industry, pulling the Dollar from the brink, telling people how much they can make, shutting down a few settlements, reinstating a Honduran leader legally voted from office, taking over 16% of the economy, fending off more coming Tea Party anger because of all the other new tax increases and cleaning up a few trillion in new debt. Routine day at the office. Glad it’s not mine.

If you would like more information about these proposals or would like to schedule a complimentary consultation to see how they will impact your planning let us know by emailing me at info@parmanlaw.com.

My clients tire of me telling them this. Yet, too often it seems a well designed estate plan goes awry. Here’s an example I picked up from a post by Lou Ann Anderson in a report she wrote. Pay attention to this. This concerns a large estate. That’s not the point. It happens to estates of all sizes.
In New York City a trial is underway in which Anthony Marshall, son of New York socialite and philanthropist Brooke Astor, and estate planning attorney Francis Morrissey, Jr., face charges of using undue influence and other fraudulent activities to divert more than $100 million of Astor’s estate to Marshall and away from long-standing charitable beneficiaries. Along the way, a number of attorneys, including Morrissey, handsomely profited from this effort. Morrissey is facing criminal charges and other attorneys involved are viewed as having committed major ethical breaches.
Allegedly, Brooke Astor was the target of what’s referred to as an Involuntary Redistribution of Assets, an effort in which estate planning documents were used to divert assets in a manner believed contrary to her intentions. Similar acts are occurring throughout the U.S. with estates of all sizes being targeted.
There are some, including Ms. Anderson, who believe that misbehavior within the legal community is causing this to happen far too frequently. If it happens once it’s too often. A more accurate interpretation is that there are bad apples in all professions – medical, accounting, financial, banking and…legal. Let’s concede the point that each industry needs to crack down on these transgressions. Typically, the legal system cleans up the bad actors.
That’s not the point. The point is bad behavior can ruin a good plan, whether the behavior comes from your advisors, your trustees, or more typically your own beneficiaries. Expert legal counsel can advise you how to create an estate plan that will carry out your wishes to a “T.”
Visit our website at www.parmanlaw.com should you be interested in additional information about how to ensure your estate matters are handled properly.

Legacy Planning

INTRODUCTION
By now most of America is familiar with the tragic events of Terri Schiavos life. No matter how you may feel about the moral and political issues that have arisen, most Americans would agree that they would not want their families to suffer through the 15-year ordeal that Terri and her family endured. Fortunately, there are means within easy reach of any American to plan for end-of-life medical decisions.

Born to Mary and Robert Schindler on December 3, 1963, Theresa Marie Schindler had a typical, happy childhood. The Pennsylvania native enjoyed spending time with her two siblings, listening to music and drawing sketches. In November 1984, at just under 21 years of age, Terri married Michael Schiavo. By age 26, Terri was employed and living in Florida with her husband.

Sadly, it was at this age that Terris life took a devastating turn. In February 1990, Terri suffered a heart attack that deprived her brain of oxygen for five minutes, damaging it severely. She slipped into what doctors call a “persistent vegetative state,” in which she lost the brain functions that control judgment and reason. She could not communicate and her only movements were minor reflexes. Terri could not even survive without the assistance of a feeding tube.
This report will tell you how the proper estate planning tools can guarantee that your end-of-life decisions are carried out. Click below to learn more about:

* Legal Options that can Prevent Family Turmoil: Healthcare Power of Attorney and Living Will
* Why Estate Plan Reviews Are Essential
* Why You Need to Update Your Estate Plan Due to Life Changes

Back to the list of articles BACK TO SPECIAL REPORTS

This Report is Compliments of Parman & Easterday. If you would like a hardcopy of this report please email lparman@parmanlaw.com or call (405) 843-6100.

Some people mistakenly believe that drafting a will avoids the costly, time-consuming legal process called probate. Read this article to find out about wills, probate and Living Trusts.

Although Probate is supposed to ensure that possessions pass on to your loved ones as you wish, in reality, it has become a costly, time-consuming and bureaucratic process that seems to serve the needs of everyone but you and your loved ones.

Want the intimate details of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis’ life? You don’t have to read the tabloids or the latest unauthorized biography. You can peruse the details of her finances and last wishes for her loved ones in the public records of the state of New York. And thousands have.

Can you imagine anything more ironic? The most private public figure of the 20th century, Mrs. Onassis went to great lengths to avoid the paparazzi’s camera. And in the end, for what? Because she used a will to dispose of her assets, she ensured that details of her $200 million estate and the terms of her final wishes would be made public.

Why You Don’t Want To Be Caught Dead With a Will

Even if celebrity status hasn’t thrust you into the public eye, you can still learn from Mrs. Onassis’ mistakes.

Throughout the centuries, property holders have used wills to convey their worldly goods to their loved ones and a legal process called “probate” has developed to administer property disposed of by will. It’s often a long, drawn-out process that seems to serve the needs of everyone but you…and your loved ones.

Click below to learn more about Probate and solutions to avoid Probate from the following sections:

* How Probate Works
* The Public Eye
* The Waiting Game
* Paying the Piper–and the Rest of the Band
* Death, Taxes,and Death Taxes
* Avoiding Probate
* The Solution: The Revocable Living Trust
* How a Living Trust Works
* Your First Step in Designing Your Living Trust

Back to the list of articles BACK TO SPECIAL REPORTS

This Report is Compliments of Parman & Easterday. If you would like a hardcopy of this report please email lparman@parmanlaw.com or call (405) 843-6100.

For seniors, the debate over Wills versus Probate holds special meaning, because the vast majority of Probate cases revolve around the affairs of those Americans ages 60 and over.

Want to see two groups who make the Republicans and Democrats look like one big, happy family? Then put into one room those attorneys who believe in probate and those who prefer their clients manage their affairs with a Revocable Living Trust. You’ll get as contentious an assembly as you could possibly hope for.

For seniors, the debate has special meaning, because the vast majority of probate cases revolve around the affairs of those Americans ages 60 and over. This report from the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys explores the reasons for the debate and offers guidelines to help seniors steer clear of the fray.

What Probate Does

Just what is probate? First, it’s important to note that it comes in two “flavors.” Living Probate is a legal process that determines your fate when you cannot-generally because you’ve been disabled by injury, illness, or mental capacity.

Death probate is the process that disposes of your estate after you die. Having a will virtually guarantees that your estate will go through probate. But then again, so will dying without any estate plan at all.

While probate attorneys might be happy with these definitions, Trust attorneys would draw your attention to all the problems that come with probate: red-tape, expense, publicity, delay, loss of control, and in the case of “living” probate, potential for personal humiliation.

Click the registration link to learn more about Probate from the following sections:

* The Impact on seniors
* How Probate Affects Seniors’ Families
* What AARP Has to Say About Probate
* Why Attorneys Disagree About Probate
* Is Probate Even Necessary?
* How to Avoid Probate with a Living Trust
* Just for the Wealthy
* Getting the Most From Your Living Trust
* Penny Wise, Pound Foolish

Back to the list of articles BACK TO SPECIAL REPORTS

This Report is Compliments of Parman & Easterday. If you would like a hardcopy of this report please email lparman@parmanlaw.com or call (405) 843-6100.

Trust Administration is the process people often find themselves in unexpectedly, after the death of a spouse or parent who created the trust prior to passing on. It comes during a very emotional time, and often brings with it difficult and complex financial and family issues. The task of reviewing the trust and finding and valuing the assets of a recently deceased family member can be daunting, as can be the complexities of estate tax law. What is important to remember for anyone administering a trust is that there is a definite process to follow, and resources to assist you as you assume this new role.

After finding a firm emotional foundation, it is time to address the task of administering the trust set up by the deceased.

Click below to learn more about Trust Administration from the following sections:

* A Tale of Two Estates
* Take Action
* Stages of Trust Administration
* Common Funding Pitfall
* Trustee Responsibility & Liability
* Income Tax Consequences
* Additional Pitfalls
* Role of the Attorney
* Don’t Delay
* Definitions & Checklist
* Frequently Asked Questions

Back to the list of articles BACK TO SPECIAL REPORTS

This Report is Compliments of Parman & Easterday. If you would like a hardcopy of this report please email lparman@parmanlaw.com or call (405) 843-6100.

If you have a dog, cat or other pet, you know that the unconditional love and affection our pets devote to us improve the quality of our lives in ways nothing else can. This is why they deserve our respect and dedication even after we pass away or become incapacitated.

Unfortunately, if a pet owner becomes unable to care for his or her pets they often end up living on the street. Thousands of pets are orphaned every year in the United States. To prevent your pets from adding to this sad statistic, you need to plan now for their care in the future.

One way to do this is to include your pets in your estate plan. This can be as simple as incorporating provisions for them into your Will or Living Trust. A Durable General Power of Attorney will allow an agent of your choosing to spend funds that have been allocated to your pets as he or she sees fit in the best interest of your pets.

Back to the list of articles BACK TO SPECIAL REPORTS

This Report is Compliments of Parman & Easterday. If you would like a hardcopy of this report please email lparman@parmanlaw.com or call (405) 843-6100.

Joint tenancy ownership of property is sometimes used as a substitute for an effective estate plan. Is this a good idea? Read this article to find out.

Although Joint Tenancy offers some short-term conveniences, in the long run it poses a host of problems that can cost you and your loved ones many times the expense and headaches you thought you were avoiding.

For the vast majority of American couples, “till death do us part” also means “till death do we hold our property in Joint Tenancy.”

It happens almost automatically. When you and your spouse open a checking account, buy a car, purchase a home, or acquire just about any other asset you can think of, the first–and usually only–impulse is to put the title in both your names as Joint Tenants.

Married couples aren’t the only ones relying on Joint Tenancy. This ownership strategy is widely used by friends, life partners, parents and their children, among others. It’s an ownership method so pervasive, many consumers often say they know of no others.

Why is Joint Tenancy so frequently employed? Ironically, otherwise well informed consumers choose Joint Tenancy because they’ve heard it is a cost-free replacement for a will and that it avoids probate. These consumers focus on the fact that at the death of one of the owners, Joint Tenancy–or more precisely, Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship– immediately passes full ownership of an asset onto the surviving Joint Tenant by operation of law. So, yes, it does circumvent probate and avoid the need for a will. At least for the moment.

What all too many Americans unfortunately overlook is the fact that Joint Tenancy only temporarily avoids probate. It also brings with it a slew of problems that more than make up for any short-term convenience it provides. In fact, Joint Tenancy can end up costing you–and your loved ones–many times the expense and headaches you thought you were avoiding.

Click below to learn more about Joint Tenancy from the following sections:

* Probate, After All
* Losing Control
* The $675,000 Question
* Capital Gains Exposure
* Joint Tenancy and Gift Taxes
* Exposure to Risk
* Alternatives to Joint Tenancy

Back to the list of articles BACK TO SPECIAL REPORTS

This Report is Compliments of Parman & Easterday. If you would like a hardcopy of this report please email lparman@parmanlaw.com or call (405) 843-6100.

For most of our lives the greatest risk to our well-being isn’t death. It’s the ever-growing likelihood of becoming seriously ill or injured.

As Carolyn Henderson* anxiously watched her husband’s flickering vital signs on the Intensive Care Unit monitor, she considered the irony of their circumstances. When she and Kirk planned how they might spend their thirtieth wedding anniversary, this sickbed vigil was the farthest thing from their minds. But then on the very day they planned to celebrate 30 years of marriage, Kirk Henderson, a robust, health-conscious, ex-pro football player in his mid-fifties, unexpectedly suffered a stroke. As the hours ticked by with no sign that Kirk would regain consciousness, Carolyn considered for the first time that he might not pull through.

Although Kirk didn’t die, he hasn’t fully recovered either. Today, two years after his stroke, the aftermath of his illness has rendered him barely able to walk or use his right arm. His speech is slurred, his thinking processes are still muddled, and he will probably need physical therapy for the rest of his life. Carolyn tries not to dwell on the remnants of her husband’s illness, emphasizing instead on the miraculous progress he has made in so many areas. But just when she starts to think things are returning to normal, she’s reminded that in the eyes of the law, her husband is as good as dead.

Declared mentally incompetent in a court of law, Kirk Henderson no longer has the right to make any decisions for himself. He can’t sign a check, conduct a financial transaction, or even decide how he wishes to be cared for.

When they least expected it, the Hendersons discovered what insurance companies have been trying to tell us for years. For most of our lives, the greatest risk to our well-being isn’t death. It’s the ever-growing likelihood of becoming seriously ill or injured. And when illness or injury make us unable to manage our affairs for ourselves, we may face an ordeal nearly as debilitating as our disability itself. It’s a legal process commonly called Living Probate, and for those who must endure it, it is often a living nightmare.

Click below to learn more about Living Probate from the following sections:

* WHAT IS LIVING PROBATE?
* PUTTING YOUR FATE IN THE HANDS OF STRANGERS
* POWER OF ATTORNEY: PROVIDING A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY
* DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY: BETTER, BUT STILL NOT BEST
* HOW THE HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY SOLVES HALF THE PROBLEM
* A REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST GIVES YOU CONTROL OVER ALL ASPECTS OF YOUR LIFE
* GETTING STARTED

Back to the list of articles BACK TO SPECIAL REPORTS

This Report is Compliments of Parman & Easterday. If you would like a hardcopy of this report please email lparman@parmanlaw.com or call (405) 843-6100.

Older Posts »